By Tunde Simon
History will judge not only those who openly opposed a cause, but also those who claimed to support it while quietly working against it from within.
Many supporters of Mr. Peter Obi have watched with concern as a number of influential political actors within the South-East appeared more interested in protecting personal interests than strengthening the movement that inspired millions of Nigerians. Rather than consolidating the gains made by Peter Obi and his supporters, actions taken by certain political stakeholders have created the impression of a deliberate effort to weaken the very structures that gave the movement its strength.
One of the most troubling developments was the sidelining of Hon. Uchenna Harris Okonkwo, son of the late Senator Annie Okonkwo, a respected political figure and long-time friend and ally of Peter Obi. To many observers, this was not merely an internal political decision; it was perceived as an attempt to dismantle a strategic pillar of support within both Peter Obi’s political and business networks.
Supporters argue that individuals such as Tony Nwoye and other key South East stakeholders such as Sen. Ben Obi, Prof. Osita Ogbu, Prof. Udenta Udenta, Sam Egwu amongst others, played significant roles in political manoeuvres that ultimately worked against the interests of the Obi movement. Whether motivated by personal ambition or political calculations, the outcome has left many questioning the sincerity of those who publicly profess loyalty while allegedly pursuing a different agenda behind closed doors.
The replacement of Uchenna Okonkwo with an Aide of Bala Mohammed on the NDC platform has generated considerable controversy among party supporters. Critics have described the decision as a departure from the values of integrity, loyalty, competence, and grassroots representation that many believed the movement stood for. To these supporters, the decision represented not progress but a weakening of the principles that attracted millions of Nigerians to the cause of political reform.
What makes the situation particularly painful is that the perceived attack did not come from political opponents. Rather, it appeared to originate from individuals within the broader South-East political establishment who should have been protecting and strengthening the collective aspirations of the region.
Political movements are rarely defeated solely by external opposition. More often, they are weakened by internal divisions, personal ambitions, and the unwillingness of leaders to place collective interests above individual gain. The lesson from this episode is clear: no movement can succeed when loyalty is rewarded with exclusion and sacrifice is met with betrayal.
For many supporters, the events surrounding Uchenna Okonkwo’s exclusion are not simply about one individual or one political ticket. They symbolize a larger struggle over the future of a movement, the preservation of trust, and the question of whether those entrusted with leadership are truly committed to the ideals they publicly proclaim.
Comrade Tunde Simon is a political analyst and can be reached on tundesimon@yahoo.com
NewsAnnexOnline 